Engineering Resources
properties and flow
Pneumatic transport
Process Safety
Welcome to

Minimum Ignition Energy of dust

Physical meaning and use in risk assessment of powder MIE

Do you have a question, a remark ? Please contact the author at

Section summary
1. Definition of MIE
2. Determination of MIE
3. MIE typical values
4. Use in risk assessment
5. MIE of common dusts

1. Definition of MIE

The Minimum Ignition Energy MIE is very important for dust explosion risks analysis, it will show how easy a dust cloud can be ignited. The MIE is equal to the minimal energy needed to be brought by a spark to a dust cloud of a given concentration in order to ignite it following a specific experimental procedure [Laurent].

2. Experimental determination of MIE

The MIE is measured experimentally. The experiment consists in putting in suspension dust of the material to be tested in a cloud that has a concentration in between the minimum explosion concentration and maximum explosion concentration (determining this concentration may need additional experiments). It may be necessary to standardize the particle size distribution prior to testing the powder [Glor] : having dust less than 63 microns is mentioned in European norm and in different research papers. It is important as the MIE decreases with the particle size and even if the product has a size larger than 63 microns, bulk solids handling operations like pneumatic transport may lead to the generation of fine dusts [Glor]. The humidity, an important contributing factor in dust explosion, should also be standardized for the test [EN13821].

Sparks are then created thanks to electrodes. Depending on the energy involves, the sparks are able or not to trigger an explosion.

The MIE is the smallest energy observed on the electrodes that triggers an explosion of the powder at the concentration tested. Smaller energies do not trigger explosion.

To be representative, such experiences must be carried out by reputable test institutes with a clear protocol (example : ASTM E2019 in US, IEC 1241-2-3 or EN 13821 in Europe). The test machine mentioned in the norm is also important as values may be slightly different from one apparatus to another (MIKE 3 and HARTMANN tube for example [Janes]). Many parameters can influence the result of the MIE measure, hence the need to get in touch with professional institutes.

MIE test apparatus MIKE 3
Figure 1 : MIKE 3 Minimum Ignition Explosion test apparatus

It must also be noted that MIE can be tested with and without inductance in the test apparatus [Janes]. Testing with inductance is conservative and should give the lowest possible value of MIE. However, if the process conditions are well defined and risks only concern static electricity sparks, it may be interesting to discuss with the test institute in order to check if the MIE without inductance would be more relevant. If other sources of ignitions are to be considered or if the process conditions are not well known, tests with inductance will give more safety margins.

3. MIE typical values

MIE typically range from 1 mJ to 1000 mJ [Janes]. The lower the MIE, the higher is the risk of explosion as a very small energy input can trigger a dust cloud explosion.

MIE < 3 mJ should be processed with specific measures, the dust is extremely sensitive to ignition. Some equipment suppliers even refuse to handle projects with such low MIE as they are extremely sensitive even to small sparks.

MIE = 3 mJ and above requires special attention and measures to process the powder taking into account such risks as static electricity, mechanical sparks...etc...

Each processor must carry out a dust explosion risk analysis in order to assess the risk related to a specific material in a specific process and take necessary precaution and mitigation measures.

4. Use in risk assessment

The MIE is a key data to consider for every source of ignition as the energy that the source of ignition will be able to generate will or will not be susceptible to trigger an explosion depending if it is lower or higher than the MIE.

It is necessary to calculate the energy triggered by the source of ignition during a risk assessment, for example for the following sources of ignition :

- Spark discharge

- Brush discharge

- Corona discharge

- Propagating brush discharge

- Cone dischartges

- Mechanical sparks

- etc...

It is also VERY important to verify if the gas in the mixture dust / gas is only air or if any flammable gas or solvent is susceptible to be present. Indeed, a flammable gas can drastically decrease the MIE of the mixture and make situation extremely hazardous [Glor]. This should be determined in risks analysis.

5. MIE of common dusts

Please find below some MIE data given in the litterature. WARNING : these are general values given without guarantee, a risk assessment and design must ALWAYS refer to the MSDS of the ACTUAL product used for tests carried out specifically on the ACTUAL material by a reputable institute.

Results from different sources can also differ as the test procedures are very sensitive many parameters (see above), it thus requires extra caution to check in which conditions the dusts were tested, and if necessary requires additional tests.

Table 1 : Minimum Ignition Energy MIE of common materials in mJ, in air

Material MIE mJ
85 [Mills]
Grain dust
55 [Mills]
35 [Mills]
Wheat flour
50 [Mills]
55 [Mills]

Wood flour 40 [Mills]
Nylon 20 [Mills]
Polyethylene 10 [Mills]
Polystyrene 15 [Mills]
Aluminium 15 [Mills]
Magnesium 40 [Mills]


# [Laurent] Securite des procedes chimiques, Andre Laurent, Tec et Doc, 2003, page 241
# [Glor] Ignition hazard due to static electricity in particulate processes, Martin Glor, Powder Technology, 135-136 2003
# [EN13821] European norm EN13821:2002 Potentially explosive atmospheres — Explosion prevention
and protection — Determination of minimum ignition energy of dust/air mixtures
# [Janes] MIKE 3 versus HARTMANN apparatus : comparison of measured minimum ignition energy (MIE), Journal of Hazardous Materials, Elsevier, 2008, 152 (1), pp.32-39.
# [Mills] Pneumatic Conveying Design Guide, David Mills, Butterworth Heinemann, 2004, page 577