Question or remark ? Please contact us at admin@powderprocess.net
Section summary |
---|
What is a DHA
(dust hazard analysis) ? |
1. Step 1 Zoning :
probability of presence of a dust cloud |
2. Step 2 Ignition source : assess
the risk of ignition |
3. Step 3 Calculate the risk |
4. Step 4 Manage the risk and
take actions |
Dust explosions constitute the major safety risk for industries operating powder and bulk solids handling processes, but there are tools to assess the dangers caused by dust explosion and that help to put in place measures to avoid dust hazards. This page explains how dust explosion risks assessments are typically done.
It is mandatory in many countries, and in many international companies, to carry out a dust explosion risk analysis of an industrial process. Dust explosions happen and are very destructive, avoiding or mitigating them is necessary to operate safely a process handling bulk solids.
The risk of dust explosion is the product of :
the
probability of presence of a dust cloud in explosive
concentration
x
the probability of presence of an ignition source susceptible to
ignite the powder
Higher probabilities may lead to specific measures to manage the risk.
In the US, NFPA norms, such as NFPA
652 define how to manage risks related to dust handling. This
applies to all process plants. The standard is defining how to
carry out a systematic analysis in order to identify the risks of
dust explosion and then define how to manage them. For
industrials, having such an analysis is mandatory and can be
asked by the authorities such as OSHA.
NFPA 652 is quite general and give
the basics common to all industries. Other NFPA standards that
could be relevant are :
NFPA 654 – manufacturing, processing, and handling—broadest
regulation and the base for the others
NFPA 61 – agricultural and food processing (organic dusts)
NFPA 484 – combustible metals
NFPA 655 – sulfur
NFPA 664 – wood processing and woodworking
NFPA 68 – deflagration venting
NFPA 69 – explosion prevention systems
In Europe, similar regulations have
been enforced since the 90s and take the name ATEX
(Atmosphere Explosive). A dust explosion analysis is also
required.
This page is mainly based on the
european ATEX regulation and follows the methodology advised by
this norm but most of the principles explained overlap with
the template of a DHA - Dust Hazard Analysis - which is
basically requiring to list which are the hazards (paragraph 3,
4), where they are located (paragraph 4) and how to mitigate them
(paragraph
5).
A risk of explosion is present only where a fine powder cloud can be present. The 1st task is thus to assess where dust can be put in suspension in hazardous concentration. The probability of presence is then defined from zone 20 to 21 and 22. More information on the zoning and how to rank it is given here. In the US, the locations are classified in 3 categories :
If there is a hazard, additional studies to determine the risk and
hazard management measures is required.
For each area identified as an ATEX zone, thus where there is possibility to have a dust cloud, the next task is to define the risk of ignition source. It is a very detailed analysis that needs to go equipment by equipment, looking at its design and the possible malfunctions that could lead to ignition.
Top
5 Most Popular
1.
Pneumatic transport design guide
2. Ribbon
blenders
3. Powder mixing
4. Hoppers design guide
5. Measuring degree of
mixing
--------------
Top 5 New
1. Continuous Dry Mixing
2. Mixing speed
3. Mixer cycle time
optimization
4. Batch
/ continuous mixing comparison
5. Energy Savings
The details of all possible ignition sources to consider can be found here.
It is advised to generate one analysis table for each source of ignition. For example, for mechanical sparks, the attention will be focused a lot on rotating equipment, if the rotating equipment is very slow as can be an airlock rotary valve, the risk of spark will be low or non existent. On the other hand, for a mill reaching 20-40 m/s in tip speed, the risk will be high that sparks happen in case of malfunction or presence of foreign bodies.
The combination of the zone classification and the probability of having an ignition source in this zone can then be represented on a table. The table helps to spot dangerous situations requiring actions.
Taking again the example of a milling system, the zoning inside the equipment will be 20, while the risk of ignition will be rare or likely depending on the design. It brings the combination to the top of the table, which points out that the risk is not acceptable as such and measures must be taken.
In case a risk requiring action is identified, the factory needs to put in place some measures to manage it and operate safely. This can be of different natures :
You can access here examples of dust hazards analysis :