Menu
access
PowderProcess.net
Engineering Resources
Solids
properties and flow
Unit
operations
Equipment
Handbook
Mixing
Handbook
Pneumatic transport
Handbook
Process Safety
Handbook
About
Welcome to

ATEX Dust explosion risk assessment - DHA Dust Hazard analysis

Guideline to perform a dust explosion risk assessment of bulk solids handling process

Question or remark ? Please contact us at powder.process@protonmail.com


Section summary
1. Introduction
2. Zoning
3. Ignition sources
4. Calculate the risk
5. Manage the risk


1. Introduction

It is mandatory in many countries, and in many international companies, to carry out a dust explosion risk analysis of an industrial process. Dust explosions happen and are very destructive, avoiding or mitigating them is necessary to operate safely a process handling bulk solids.

The risk of dust explosion is the product of the probability of presence of a dust cloud in explosive concentration per the probability of presence of an ignition source susceptible to ignite the powder.

Higher probabilities may lead to specific measures to manage the risk.

This page is mainly based on the european ATEX regulation but most of the principles explained can be used for a DHA - Dust Hazard Analysis.

2. Zoning : probability of presence of a dust cloud

A risk of explosion is present only where a fine powder cloud can be present. The 1st task is thus to assess where dust can be put in suspension in hazardous concentration. The probability of presence is then defined from zone 20 to 21 and 22. More information on the zoning and how to rank it is given here.

3. Ignition source : assess the risk of ignition

For each area identified as an ATEX zone, thus where there is possibility to have a dust cloud, the next task is to define the risk of ignition source. It is a very detailed analysis that needs to go equipment by equipment, looking at its design and the possible malfunctions that could lead to ignition.

The details of all possible ignition sources to consider can be found here.

It is advised to generate one analysis table for each source of ignition. For example, for mechanical sparks, the attention will be focused a lot on rotating equipment, if the rotating equipment is very slow as can be an airlock rotary valve, the risk of spark will be low or non existent. On the other hand, for a mill reaching 20-40 m/s in tip speed, the risk will be high that sparks happen in case of malfunction or presence of foreign bodies.

4. Calculate the risk

The combination of the zone classification and the probability of having an ignition source in this zone can then be represented on a table. The table helps to spot dangerous situations requiring actions.

ATEX Risk Matrix

Taking again the example of a milling system, the zoning inside the equipment will be 20, while the risk of ignition will be rare or likely depending on the design. It brings the combination to the top of the table, which points out that the risk is not acceptable as such and measures must be taken.

5. Manage the risk

In case a risk requiring action is identified, the factory needs to put in place some measures to manage it and operate safely. This can be of different natures :

- Reduce the probability of dust cloud : for example if an equipment is opened or leaking creating a dust cloud outside, repairing it or changing the design can improve the zoning.

- Reduce the probability of ignition : coming back to the example above on a rotary equipment, if a screw is found to rotate too quick, it may be possible to run it slower without consequence for the process. If necessary, the equipment can be changed. For electrostatics for examples, some procedures can be put in place to make sure the whole installation is properly grounded.

-Put in place mitigation measures : if the risk of explosion cannot be controlled by prevention, it is necessary to foresee mitigation measures, like explosion vents, explosion isolation or explosion suppression. This is often the case for milling systems or some pneumatic conveying systems to large silos.


Conclusions of the risks analysis must be implemented by the factory.