(How to "Calculate Homogeneity")

Question or remark ? Please contact us at **powder.process@protonmail.com**

Section summary |
---|

1. Industrial
Question |

2. Definition of
homogeneity for a particular process |

3. Defining the
scale of scrutiny |

4. Chosing a tracer |

5. Defining the procedure to take
samples |

6. Calculating CV homogeneity |

7. Is mixing ok ? Confidence intervals |

Whenever an industrial process
includes a mixing step, the engineer in charge of the factory will be
asked to determine if the mixture produced is homogeneous. This
section explains how to determine if homogeneity target has been
reached.
## 1. Industrial question

## 2. Definition of homogeneity for a particular process

## 3. Defining the scale of scrutiny

Is the powder mix homogenous ?

It must clear that the 1st step is to define for the application considered what means "homogeneous" and what means "non homogeneous". Almost all powder mixtures will have a degree of inhomogeneity. The 1st thing to do is to determine the tolerances which are exclusively dependent on the application for which the mixture is intended. Tolerances can be defined internally, or externally by a regulation or a customer.

Example 1 : The mixture is used internally for an other unit operation within the same factory : specifications are defined within the company, and maybe are quit large in order to ensure a smooth operation.

Example 2 : The mixture is sold directly, an infant formula for example, specifications are regulated by law, and can be very narrow

Declaring a powder mix "homogeneous" means nothing if the sampling size from which the components will be analysed has not been defined. The larger the sample size, the higher will be the chances of concluding that the powder mixture is homogeneous. Contrary, when reducing the sampling size, the variability of composition will go up and higher will be the chances of concluding that the mix is not homogeneous.

The sampling size, or scale of scrutiny, must always be defined according to the use that will be made of the mixture. For example, for a food product, the sampling size is the serving size. It would make no sense to sample a quantity that the customer will never use for preparing his food : either too small or too big. For this particular example, not chosing the right sampling value could have catastrophic consequences for a company whose products would be sampled by a government agency and found not compliant (company QA found the mix homogeneous but using a sampling size much larger than the serving size used by the consumer and as a consequence the government). For pharmaceuticals products, the sampling size will have to be in line with the dose to be contained in a capsule for example.

**Top
5 Most Popular **

1.
Pneumatic transport design guide

2. Ribbon blenders

3. Powder mixing

4. Hoppers design guide

5. Measuring degree of mixing

--------

**Top 5 New **

1.
Continuous Dry Mixing

2. Mixing speed

3. Mixer cycle time optimization

4. Batch / continuous mixing
comparison

5. Energy Savings

Sampling will be of no utility if there is no way to make a distinction in between each sample. This distinction can be done thanks a particular component of the mixture that will be a tracer.

The tracer needs to be chosen carefully since he will represent the behavior of other components in the mix.

A tracer is not a major ingredient (exception : if there are only major components in the mixture)

A tracer is usually chosen among small / minor ingredients which are often of interest in the mix. It will represent their behavior.

A tracer should have the particularity to be easily analysed. It is better that the tracer is part of the mix formula, but it can also be added on purpose for a mixer validation exercise (example : salt addition).

Knowing which sampling size makes sense is a 1st step, but not sufficient. The way to take samples will be as critical.

For example, imagine a batch mixer, containing powder at the end of a mixing cycle. It would make no sense to take every samples only on the left of the mixer. Or only in the middle, or only on the right... The samples must be taken in order to represent the WHOLE mix, not only one part.

For this, different methods are possible :

- The best one will be to discharge the content of the mixer and
take samples at regular interval on the FREE FLOWING powder, from
the VERY BEGINNING to the VERY END of the flow. This way, we ensure
that no powder area in the mix was left untouched (figuer 1)

- If not possible, a sampling in the mixer will be necessary. For
this, a sampling tool must be used and a sampling plan must be
defined in order to make sure that no area of the mixer remain not
sampled. This method is particularly difficult since it may not be
possible to reach with ease every point of the mixer, and the
sampling tool may induced a sampling bias on the results (figure 2).

It is recommended to take more than 30 samples in order to have statistically representative results

Figure 1 : Sampling on free flowing powder

Figure 2 : Sampling in mixer with thief probe

After sampling, the samples taken are analysed regarding the presence of the tracer. Then results are recorded and statistics can be peformed.

The mixture, regarding the tracer, will be defined according to the mean concentration of the tracer and to the standard deviation of the tracer concentration. Mean and standard deviation will be used to calculate the relative standard deviation of the mix, that will be the value assimilated to "homogeneity".

Equation 1 : Relative Standard Deviation of the mixture

S is the samples standard deviation, it is not the actual standard deviation since only an estimation can be given from the samples. μ is the arithemical average of the samples concentration, thus as well calculated from the samples.

This value is often expressed in % and called also the coefficient of variation

Equation 2 : Coefficient of variation of the mixture

The value obtained is then compared to the specification.

WARNING : the CV that will be obtained has actually several components, and some of these components need to be calculated in order to estimate the actual homogeneity variance.

The sample variance is calculated thanks to :

S^{2}=S_{mix}^{2}+S_{analytical}^{2}+(S_{sampling}^{2})

The variability due to sampling is very difficult to determine, thus, in practice, it will be neglected. However, for this assumption to be true it is critical to sample the mix following the methods explained above, and preferably on the free flowing powder.

The variability due to analysis can either be known, if experiments have been done before, or can be determined for the particular homogeneity validation by doubling the measurement on the same sample.

Smix can then be calculated. Then CVmix(%)

WARNING : Once CVmix(%) calculated, it is not sufficient to compare it to the specification. Indeed, the variance calculated is NOT a true variance but is estimated on the sampling. This estimation must be taken into account by calculating a confidence interval, generally at 95%, which corresponds to 2 sigma on each side of the mean.

The specification can then be compared to the confidence interval :

- If the CVspec > upper border of the confidence interval : the
mixing is successful, the mix is significantly better than the
specification

- If CVspec is in the confidence interval : the mixing may be
successful, but it is also possible that the actual CVmix is >
CVspec

- If CVspec is < lower border of the confidence interval : the
mixing homogeneity achieved is not good enough for the application.

- Accept the mix

- Reject the mix and look for root causes (mixer speed, filling rate of mixer...)Sources

**Sources**

[1] Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook

Article
: Is The Homogeneity Of Your Dry Mix Acceptable?, Thomas
Lamotte, Chemical Processing Magazine, 2018