Section summary |
---|
1. Introduction |
2. Diffusive (or dispersion) mixing |
3. Convective Mixing |
4. Shear Mixing |
5. Classification of mixers |
There are 3 types of mixing identified for bulk solids : diffusive mixing, convective mixing and shear mixing. Many design of industrial mixers are available and one can select a mixer based on any of these mechanisms or even a combination of those mechanisms. This page aims at detailing the mixing mechanisms and defining what kind of mixer fits in each category.
In diffusive mixing, the particles of solids move randomly, typically rolling down when their container is rotated. There is no forced pattern in the mixer, as such than the one that could be done by an agitator, but particles are moving locally one by one.
This type of mixing is typically long and sensitive to segregation.
Tumbler mixers, drum blenders, IBC blenders typically fall in this category, although their design can be complicated by the addition of an agitator (intensifier bar) that gives some convective or shear mixing.
For convective mixing, the movement of solids is forced thanks to a mixing tool ("agitator") that is defining a pattern within the convective mixer. The mixing tool is moving large groups of particles, splitting the bulk of particles and thereby achieving mixing.
Mixing will be typically shorter than for diffusive mixers, although the actual mixing time will depend largely in the design of the agitator, process parameters and nature of the solids to be mixed.
Ribbon blenders, a very widespread dry mixer is working according to convective mixing, as well as paddle mixers, although paddle mixers are fluidizing the mixture, which constitute a kind of sub-type of convective mixing.
Top
5 Most Popular
1.
Pneumatic transport design guide
2. Ribbon
blenders
3. Powder mixing
4. Hoppers design guide
5. Measuring degree of
mixing
------------
Top 5 New
1.
Continuous Dry Mixing
2. Mixing speed
3. Mixer cycle time optimization
4. Batch / continuous mixing
comparison
5. Energy Savings
In shear mixing, a mixing tool at high speed is used to make groups of particles slip in between each others. Such shearing force can be particularly efficient for granulation when the mixture has some undesirable agglomerates that should be broken down to achieve a good mix.
Ploughshare mixers, when operated at sufficiently high speed rely on convective AND shear mixing. To be noted that some deagglomerators can be fitted in other types of mixer to give them some shearing capabilities.
Fr | Mixing class | Mixer type | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|---|
< 1 | Diffusion | Type free fall mixers V Blenders Double Cone blenders Bin blenders Drums blenders |
Very simple Low energy required Gentle mix No mixing elements in the equipment Reliability Access for cleaning |
Long mixing Cannot achieve good mixing for powders of very different particle sizes Segregation effects can be experienced |
< 1 | Convection | Type thrust mixer Ribbon Blenders Screw Blenders |
Achieve generally better mixing results than diffusion
blenders Low energy inputs Generally less expensive than paddle or plough share mixers |
Long mixing Mechanical complexity Access for cleaning Can damage product at long mixing time |
> 1 | Convection | Paddle Mixers Pneumatic mixers |
Short mixing time Gentle mixing Low energy input Good access for cleaning (some design can be with extractible shafts For paddle mixers, exist in continuous mixing execution For padlle mixers, a liquid injection can be foreseen |
Cost compared to diffusion tumblers / ribbon blenders If liquid injection, prone to agglomeration - then needs some additional mixing elements at higher shear For pneumatically generated fluid bed, attention must be given to risks of segregation due to fines "floating" at the top of the mixer |
>> 1 | Convection Shearing |
Plough Share Mixers High shear mixing elements |
Short mixing time Reduce risks of powder agglomeration Exist in continuous mixing execution |
Higher powder breakage High energy input Cost |