Question or remark ? Please contact us at admin@powderprocess.net
Section summary |
---|
1. Froude number
calculation |
2. Froude number
references for common powder mixers |
Powder mixing is based on the movement of the particles part of the recipe to be mixed. The movement can be of different types, and different designs of mixers will correspond to different mixing principles.
Mixers are often classified thanks to the Froude number. Froude number significance : this adimensional number will define the regime of mixing depending on its value.
Froude number is defined in equation 1 [Perry]:
Equation 1 : Froude number formula
With
R = mixer radius or mixer agitator radius
ω = angular velocity
It can be expressed in a more convenient form for powder mixers having a mixing element (agitator) in equation 2:
Equation 2 : Froude number calculation for blender equipped with a mixing tool (ribbon, paddles...)
With
u = tip speed mixing element
D = diameter of mixing element
What is the Froude number ? Froude number is comparing 2 forces :
Fr = (forces other than gravity, mainly centrifugal) / gravity
Top
5 Most Popular
1.
Pneumatic transport design guide
2. Ribbon
blenders
3. Powder mixing
4. Hoppers design guide
5. Measuring degree of
mixing
----------
Top 5 New
1.
Continuous Dry Mixing
2. Mixing speed
3. Mixer cycle time optimization
4. Batch / continuous mixing
comparison
5. Energy Savings
Among the common mixers used industrially for powder mixing, the table below is proposing a classification according to Froude number
Table 1 : Mixer classified according to their Froude number and mixing principle
Fr | Mixing class | Mixer type | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|---|
< 1 | Diffusion | Type free fall mixers V Blenders Double Cone blenders Bin blenders Drums blenders |
Very simple Low energy required Gentle mix No mixing elements in the equipment Reliability Access for cleaning |
Long mixing Cannot achieve good mixing for powders of very different particle sizes Segregation effects can be experienced |
< 1 | Convection | Type thrust mixer Ribbon Blenders Screw Blenders |
Achieve generally better mixing results than diffusion
blenders Low energy inputs Generally less expensive than paddle or plough share mixers |
Long mixing Mechanical complexity Access for cleaning Can damage product at long mixing time |
> 1 | Convection | Paddle
Mixers Pneumatic mixers |
Short mixing time Gentle mixing Low energy input Good access for cleaning (some design can be with extractible shafts For paddle mixers, exist in continuous mixing execution For padlle mixers, a liquid injection can be foreseen |
Cost compared to diffusion tumblers / ribbon blenders If liquid injection, prone to agglomeration - then needs some additional mixing elements at higher shear For pneumatically generated fluid bed, attention must be given to risks of segregation due to fines "floating" at the top of the mixer |
>> 1 | Convection Shearing |
Plough
Share Mixers High shear mixing elements |
Short mixing time Reduce risks of powder agglomeration Exist in continuous mixing execution |
Higher powder breakage High energy input Cost |
Another type of classification could be proposed depending on the type of process where mixers are integrated : Batch or Continuous. If batch mixers probably represent the majority of the industrial applications, some types of mixers (paddle mixers) can be used in a continuous mode, which can be useful for some kind of processes.
You can open a free Excel calculator for the Froude number here : Froude Excel Calculator